Breaking News

Main Menu

Mepdg Version 1.100 Download

четверг 14 февраля admin 58
Mepdg Version 1.100 Download Rating: 5,7/10 5383 votes

Email is required. Please enter valid email. AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design ***AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design v2.5 is now available. [7/2/2018]*** AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design is the next generation of AASHTOWare® pavement design software, which builds upon the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide, and expands and improves the features in the accompanying prototype computational software. ME Design supports AASHTO's Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition: A Manual of Practice. ME Design is a production-ready software tool to support the day-to-day pavement design functions of public and private pavement engineers.

The Pavement ME Deflection Data Analysis and Backcalculation Tools is a standalone software program that can be used to generate backcalculation inputs to the AASHTO Pavement ME Design software for rehabilitation design. The tool is capable of analyzing raw deflection data files obtained from Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing devices, backcalculating in-place elastic layer moduli for flexible and rigid pavements and generating inputs for performing rehabilitation design using Pavement ME. Watch da vinci code in hindi 300mb.

Cal Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) has been developed in the United. Later versions correct some of its deficiencies:The program. Only 1.1 M ESALs.

It can also be used to perform loss of support analysis and load transfer efficiency (LTE) calculations.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, contact Dr. Ed Harrigan, Senior Program Officer 500 Fifth St. NW Washington DC 20001 Phone 202 334-3232 Fax 202 334-2006 E-mail ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER This is the final draft as submitted by the research agency.

The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research agency. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program.