Zonealarm Pro 10 Keygen Idm

• Jenn looks at some famous cars at the Philadelphia Auto Show • Josiah Yiadom helps Sue with the weather • Kappa Alpha Psi helps Good Day Step into Black History Month • Alex Around Town: The Post • Cars of Eagles players, Lil Uzi Vert, to be on display at Philadelphia Auto Show • The African American Children's Book Fair is taking place this weekend! • Consumer Reports tests 45 fruit juices, finds 4 types of metals • Jenn checks out 97.5 The Fanatic's 'Super Hole Weekend' corn hole tournament • Philadelphia's last major drug encampment closes in Kensington.

Medal of honor warfighter pc. I think too many are missing the point with Linda Sarsour, the Women’s March and its anti-Semitism. And as I shared with friends on Facebook recently, here’s why: Last week to Jews for not coming out clearly enough against Louis Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism; her words did nothing for me. The bigger issue than distancing from Farrakhan is distancing from BDS and anti-Zionism.

But Sarsour takes the opposite stance;. For me, her position regarding the legitimacy of Israel and its supporters vis-a-vis the Palestinians is what makes her position anti-Semitic. Here, she pretty much avoids that discussion. Let’s start with anti-Zionism.

I personally do not believe that one has to be anti-Israel to be pro-Palestinian. Both peoples need to have a home and self-determination (though I cannot see the PA and Hamas ever uniting or holding elections again let alone allowing alternative political groups to arise that actually seeks peaceful coexistence, but that is a topic for another day).

Customer Service. (405) 478-7171. HOURS: Mon-Fri: 6am-5pm, Sat: 6am-9am, Sun: 6am-10am. Digital Support. (405) 475-4000. HOURS: Mon-Fri: 8am-5pm.

I do believe she and other anti-Zionists’ demonization of Israel contributes to anti-Semitism that comes from the far left & is exclusionary. Though it is good she has distanced herself and the March from Farrakhan here, it is not enough. That is an easy thing to do, given his anti-Semitic homophobic and transphobic positions. (Though I must say, if are correct, that puts all their sincerity into question.) At any rate, Sarsour and the Women’s March organizers need to do better. They need to address their position on Zionism, on Israel, on American Jewish women who support Israel.

Her famous statement that Zionists cannot be feminists and her recent one that Americans who are Zionists are not really democratic or liberal clearly excludes anyone who supports Israel from her world. I’ve seen Jewish calls to suck it up, given her perspective, but why should intolerance and exclusion be excused, let alone the norm for a group seeking to redress societal balances? To me, her and Mallory’s pro-BDS anti-Zionist stance is what the leaders of the Women’s March need to address. If Zionism (per Merriam Webster) means a movement supporting the restablishment of a homeland in Palestine and support of the modern state of Israel (to be clear, it does NOT say “without Arabs”), then how does she define anti-Zionism? For the life of me, I cannot see any way which does not delegitimize Israel.

And if she does that to a sovereign and established state and demonizes anyone who supports it (as opposed to only criticizing its government’s actions and inactions), then she is still travelling in anti-Semitic territory. As for BDS, an argument can be made that it is anti-Semitic too. I see for boycotting, divesting and sanctioning all of Israel (and not just entities doing business in the territories) as a means of delegitimizing the country. The country exists legally; so this tactic to me is anti-Semitic. It also calls for the full right of return.

To me, dictating a demand that would redefine the nature of the country is an attempt to deny its right to decide its own fate; i.e., strip it of its sovereignty. When you say that the country recognized and defined as the homeland of the Jews cannot legitimately exist and that its supporters should be banned and excluded from everything, to me, that is anti-Semitic.